<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss xmlns:atom='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' version='2.0'><channel><atom:id>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5234812/posts/full</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 07:43:21 +0000</lastBuildDate><title>Junto Boyz</title><description></description><link>http://bernardmoon.blogspot.com</link><managingEditor>Bernard Moon</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>15</openSearch:itemsPerPage><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5234812/posts/full/116123510868620061</guid><pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 05:18:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-10-18T22:19:54.653-07:00</atom:updated><title>"THE SOUNDS OF SILENCING"... ARROGANCE OF THE LEFT...</title><description>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">&lt;div style='font-weight:bold;'>"THE SOUNDS OF SILENCING"... ARROGANCE OF THE LEFT IN AMERICA&lt;/div>&lt;br />&lt;div>&lt;a href="http://www.opinionjournal.com/columnists/pnoonan/?id=110009048++" target="_blank">Great editorial by Peggy Noonan&lt;/a>. Revealing and disturbing actions of the left are described.&amp;nbsp; Of course to be fair, the right does have crazies like &lt;a href="http://www.anncoulter.com" target="_blank">Ann Coulter&lt;/a>, but it seems the extreme words and arrogance of the left is more commonplace.&lt;br />&lt;br />&lt;a href="http://www.opinionjournal.com/columnists/pnoonan/?id=110009048++" target="_blank">&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;">The Sounds of Silencing&lt;/span>&lt;/a>&lt;br />&lt;span style="font-style: italic;">Why do Americans on the left think only they have the right to dissent?&lt;/span>&lt;br />&lt;br />&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;">The Wall Street Journal&lt;/span>&lt;br />&lt;span style="font-style: italic;">Friday, October 13, 2006&lt;/span>&lt;br />&lt;br />Four moments in the recent annals of free speech in America. Actually annals is too fancy a word. This all happened in the past 10 days:&lt;br />&lt;br />At Columbia University, members of the Minutemen, the group that patrols the U.S. border with Mexico and reports illegal crossings, were asked to address a forum on immigration policy. As Jim Gilchrist, the founder, spoke, angry students stormed the stage, shouting and knocking over chairs and tables. &amp;quot;Having wreaked havoc,&amp;quot; said the New York Sun, they unfurled a banner in Arabic and English that said, &amp;quot;No one is ever illegal.&amp;quot; The auditorium was cleared, the Minutemen silenced. Afterward a student protester told the Columbia Spectator, &amp;quot;I don't feel we need to apologize or anything. It was fundamentally a part of free speech. . . . The Minutemen are not a legitimate part of the debate on immigration.&amp;quot;&lt;br />&lt;br />On Oct. 2, on Katie Couric's &amp;quot;CBS Evening News,&amp;quot; in the segment called &amp;quot;Free Speech,&amp;quot; the father of a boy killed at Columbine shared his views on the deeper causes of the recent shootings in Amish country. Brian Rohrbough said violence entered our schools when we threw God out of them. &amp;quot;This country is in a moral freefall. For over two generations the public school system has taught in a moral vacuum. . . . We teach there are no moral absolutes, no right or wrong, and I assure you the murder of innocent children is always wrong, including abortion. Abortion has diminished the value of children.&amp;quot; This was not exactly the usual mush.&lt;br />&lt;br />Mr. Rohrbough was quickly informed he was not part of the legitimate debate, either. Howard Kurtz in the Washington Post: &amp;quot;The decision . . . to air his views prompted a storm of criticism, some of it within the ranks of CBS News.&amp;quot; A blog critic: Grief makes people say &amp;quot;stupid&amp;quot; things, but &amp;quot;what made them put this man on television?&amp;quot; Good question. How did they neglect to silence him?&lt;br />&lt;br />Soon after, at Madison Square Garden, Barbra Streisand, began her latest farewell tour with what friends who were there tell me was a moving, beautiful concert. She was in great form and brought the audience together in appreciation of her great ballads, which are part of the aural tapestry of our lives. And then . . . the moment. Suddenly she decided to bang away on politics. Fine, she's a Democrat, Bush is bad. But midway through the bangaway a man in the audience called out. Most could not hear him, but everyone seems to agree he at least said, &amp;quot;What is this, a fund-raiser?&amp;quot;&lt;br />&lt;br />At this, Ms. Streisand became enraged, stormed the stage and pummeled herself. Wait, that was Columbia. Actually she became enraged and cursed the man. A friend who was there, a liberal Democrat, said what was most interesting was Ms. Streisand made a physical movement with her arms and hands--&amp;quot;those talon hands&amp;quot;--as if to say, See what I have to put up with when I attempt to educate the masses? She soon apologized, to her credit. Though apparently in the manner of a teacher who'd just kind of lost it with an unruly and ignorant student.&lt;br />&lt;br />On &amp;quot;The View&amp;quot; a few days earlier it was Rosie O'Donnell. She was banging away on gun control. Guns are bad and should be banned. Elizabeth Hasselbeck, who plays the role of the young, attractive mom, tentatively responded. &amp;quot;I want to be fair,&amp;quot; she said. Obviously there should be &amp;quot;restrictions,&amp;quot; but women have a right to defend themselves, and there's &amp;quot;the right to bear arms&amp;quot; in the Constitution. Rosie accused Elizabeth of yelling. The panel, surprised, agreed that Elizabeth was not yelling. Rosie then went blank-faced with what someone must have told her along the way is legitimately felt rage. Elizabeth was not bowing to Rosie's views. Elizabeth needed to be educated. The education commenced, Rosie gesturing broadly and Elizabeth constricting herself as if she knew physical assault were a possibility. When Rosie gets going on the Second Amendment I always think, Oh I hope she's not armed! Actually I wonder what Freud would have made of an enraged woman obsessed with gun control. Ach, classic projection. Eef she had a gun she would kill. Therefore no one must haf guns.&lt;br />&lt;br />There's a pattern here, isn't there?... (&lt;a href="http://www.opinionjournal.com/columnists/pnoonan/?id=110009048++" target="_blank">full article&lt;/a>)&lt;/div>&lt;/div></description><link>http://bernardmoon.blogspot.com/2006/10/sounds-of-silencing.html</link><author>Bernard Moon</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5234812/posts/full/116101353844515107</guid><pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:14:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-10-17T11:35:11.923-07:00</atom:updated><title>CONGRESS WIMPS OUT ON REBUKE OF JAPAN'S COMFORT WO...</title><description>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">&lt;span style="font-weight:bold;">CONGRESS WIMPS OUT ON REBUKE OF JAPAN'S COMFORT WOMEN CRIMES&lt;/span>&lt;br />&lt;br />The Korean American community rallied to get a resolution passed that would formally acknowledge  Japan's &lt;a href="http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2006/10/15/congress_backs_off_of_wartime_japan_rebuke/" TARGET=_BLANK>"enslavement of more than 200,000 Korean, Chinese, Filipino, Indonesian, and other women and girls in the 1930s and '40s to provide sex for imperial Japanese soldiers."&lt;/a>  I helped in this cause by contacting numerous friends, emailing information about this resolution, and encouraging people to write to their representatives in Congress.  Unfortunately, this effort failed since the Japanese government brought out it's bigger lobbying guns on the Hill.&lt;br />&lt;br />I just read that it was &lt;a href="http://www.hhlaw.com/home/" target=_blank>Hogan and Hartson&lt;/a>, a top D.C. law firm, and Bob Michel, former House Majority Leader, that were the muscle for Japan.  I'm sure the Japanese Government is a big client for them and that they are just doing their job, but I still have to say, "BOB MICHEL IS A TOOL!" (Immature rant allow for such a post :)  &lt;br />&lt;br />Some news articles on this bad decision:&lt;br />&lt;a href="http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2006/10/15/congress_backs_off_of_wartime_japan_rebuke/" TARGET=_BLANK>&lt;br />"Congress backs off of wartime Japan rebuke"&lt;/a>&lt;br />&lt;br />&lt;a href="http://harpers.org/sb-cold-comfort-women-1160006345.html" target=_blank>"Cold Comfort: the Japan Lobby Blocks Resolution on WWII Sex Slaves"&lt;/a>&lt;/div></description><link>http://bernardmoon.blogspot.com/2006/10/congress-wimps-out-on-rebuke-of-japans.html</link><author>Bernard Moon</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5234812/posts/full/116049397790426464</guid><pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 15:11:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-10-10T08:26:19.606-07:00</atom:updated><title>MORE LINKS ON GOOGLE, YOUTUBE AND THIS SPACE

You ...</title><description>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">&lt;span style="font-weight:bold;">MORE LINKS ON GOOGLE, YOUTUBE AND THIS SPACE&lt;/span>&lt;br />&lt;br />You hear it, don't ya? The DeathStar music? Or at least the &lt;a href="http://161.58.5.90/austin/1million.wav">"One million dollars!"&lt;/a> shout?&lt;br />&lt;br />&lt;a href="http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1541268,00.html" target=_blank>"Google's Growing Grasp"&lt;/a> from Time Magazine, Oct. 1, 2006.&lt;br />&lt;br />&lt;a href="http://featured.gigaom.com/2006/10/09/the-future-of-social-networks-communication/" target=_blank>"The Future of Social Networks - Communication"&lt;/a> GigaOM's Robert Young.&lt;br />&lt;br />&lt;br />&lt;span style="font-weight:bold;">&lt;a href="http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article.cfm?articleid=1570&amp;CFID=1421575&amp;CFTOKEN=44244829" target=_blank>Dot-Com Bubble, Part II? Why It's So Hard to Value Social Networking Sites&lt;/a>&lt;/span>&lt;br />&lt;br />&lt;span style="font-style:italic;">October 04, 2006 in Knowledge@Wharton&lt;/span>&lt;br />&lt;br />Less than three years after emerging from nowhere, the hot social networking website MySpace is on pace to be worth a whopping $15 billion in just three more years. Or is it?&lt;br />&lt;br />Is the much smaller Facebook, run by a 22-year-old, really worth the $900 million or more Yahoo is reported to have offered for it? Maybe. Or maybe this is Dot-Com Bubble, Part II, with MySpace, Facebook, YouTube and the other new Internet phenoms destined for oblivion when the fad fades.&lt;br />&lt;br />"What makes this hard is that these companies seem to be so many years away from the kind of earnings that the valuation numbers are forecasting for them," says Andrew Metrick, finance professor at Wharton. The $15 billion MySpace figure "would imply that a lot more people will be on MySpace than are currently on it." (&lt;a href="http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article.cfm?articleid=1570&amp;CFID=1421575&amp;CFTOKEN=44244829" target=_blank>full article&lt;/a>)&lt;br />&lt;br />&lt;br />&lt;span style="font-weight:bold;">&lt;a href="http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article.cfm?articleid=1568&amp;CFID=1421575&amp;CFTOKEN=44244829" target=_blank>Coming Attraction: YouTube's Business Model&lt;/a>&lt;/span>&lt;br />&lt;br />&lt;span style="font-style:italic;">October 04, 2006 in Knowledge@Wharton&lt;/span>&lt;br />&lt;br />A deal between YouTube and Warner Music Group to share music videos and revenue could usher in an era where the interests of content copyright holders and freebie-loving consumers align. Or it could wind up being just another stab at a business model for YouTube. The outcome will be determined by how the revenue between copyright holders and distributors like YouTube gets shared, say experts at Wharton.&lt;br />&lt;br />Creating a revenue sharing model that is satisfactory to all is easier said than done, these experts note. It's a fundamental question: If "information wants to be free," as many assert, how do you make money?&lt;br />&lt;br />On Sept. 18, 2006, YouTube, the largest video sharing site on the web, and Warner Music Group announced a deal to distribute WMG's music video catalog on YouTube. The catalog includes music videos, behind-the-scenes footage, artist interviews and other special content. In addition, YouTube's bevy of amateur video producers can use WMG's music library as soundtracks for the content they upload. As for copyright management, YouTube plans to build a content identification and royalty reporting system to identify video content -- such as the most recent Madonna video -- and divvy out payments to artists. The system, to be launched by the end of the year, will allow WMG to authorize rights to YouTube users. Advertising revenue will be shared between WMG and YouTube. &lt;br />.....&lt;br />While details about the WMG/YouTube deal aren't fully fleshed out, some experts at Wharton are optimistic. &lt;span style="font-weight:bold;">Wharton marketing professor Peter Fader says YouTube's latest partnership (it also has a promotional deal with NBC) is "the single biggest business development deal in the history of digital media. This changes everything, and people will look back at it as a turning point."&lt;/span> (&lt;a href="http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article.cfm?articleid=1568&amp;CFID=1421575&amp;CFTOKEN=44244829" target=_blank>full article&lt;/a>)&lt;/div></description><link>http://bernardmoon.blogspot.com/2006/10/more-links-on-google-youtube-and-this.html</link><author>Bernard Moon</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5234812/posts/full/115994272362924364</guid><pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 06:18:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-10-10T08:10:59.216-07:00</atom:updated><title>CATCHING UP WITH SOME OLD LINKS... AND SOME VERY O...</title><description>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">&lt;span style="font-weight:bold;">CATCHING UP WITH SOME OLD LINKS... AND SOME VERY OLD LINKS&lt;br />&lt;/span>&lt;br />Some links of interest:&lt;br />&lt;a href="http://blogs.forrester.com/charleneli/2006/10/calculating_the.html" target=_blank>&lt;br />"Calculating the ROI of blogging"&lt;/a> from Charlene Li&lt;br />&lt;a href="http://www.valleywag.com/tech/myspace/room-for-a-million-more-the-usercount-inflation-of-myspace-and-its-forbears-203762.php#more" target=_blank>&lt;br />"Room for a million more: The user-count inflation of MySpace and its forbears"&lt;/a>&lt;br />&lt;br />&lt;a href="http://www.startupjournal.com/financing/capital/20060908-buckman.html?refresh=on" target=_blank>"Tech Bust's Last Chapter Plays Out at VC Firms"&lt;/a>&lt;br />&lt;br />&lt;a href="http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/2006-09-11-tech-valley_x.htm" TARGET=_BLANK>"Silicon Valley starts to party like it's 1999"&lt;/a>&lt;br />&lt;br />&lt;a href="http://mashable.com/2006/09/29/myworld-ebay-becomes-myspace/" TARGET=_BLANK>"MyWorld: eBay Becomes MySpace"&lt;/a>&lt;br />&lt;br />&lt;a href="http://www.forbes.com/2006/08/01/aol-youtube-internet_cx_lh_0802aol.html?partner=technology_newsletter" target=_blank>"Last Chance For AOL?"&lt;/a>&lt;br />&lt;br />&lt;a href="http://www.tcsdaily.com/article.aspx?id=082406B" target=_blank>"Three Can't-Miss School Reforms"&lt;/a>&lt;/div></description><link>http://bernardmoon.blogspot.com/2006/10/catching-up-with-some-old-links.html</link><author>Bernard Moon</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5234812/posts/full/116044087983841013</guid><pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 23:55:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-10-09T17:41:20.060-07:00</atom:updated><title>KI-MOON BAN, SOON-TO-BE U.N. SECRETARY GENERAL

Ba...</title><description>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">&lt;span style="font-weight:bold;">KI-MOON BAN, SOON-TO-BE U.N. SECRETARY GENERAL&lt;/span>&lt;br />&lt;br />Ban, Ki-moon of South Korea is expected to be Secretary General of the U.N.  I don't know if his low-key style what is needed at this time, but hopefully he'll at least use his administrative skills to clean up the U.N.  Very glad that Kofi Annan is gone. I hope they dig up a corruption trail that sends him to jail.  More here:&lt;br />&lt;br />&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_depth/5409746.stm" target=_blank>"No honeymoon for new UN Secretary General"&lt;/a>&lt;br />&lt;a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection/la-fg-moon9oct09,1,5979075.story?coll=la-news-a_section" target=_blank>&lt;br />"Aspiring U.N. Chief Is a Harmonizer, Not a Rock Star"&lt;/a>&lt;/div></description><link>http://bernardmoon.blogspot.com/2006/10/ki-moon-ban-soon-to-be-u.html</link><author>Bernard Moon</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5234812/posts/full/116042862265675776</guid><pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 21:17:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-10-09T16:51:17.743-07:00</atom:updated><title>GOOGLE ACQUIRES YOUTUBE... WAS IT WORTH IT?
I gues...</title><description>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">&lt;div style='font-weight:bold;'>GOOGLE ACQUIRES YOUTUBE... WAS IT WORTH IT?&lt;/div>&lt;br />&lt;div>I guess the question is, &amp;quot;Will it be worth it?&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; &lt;a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/09/google-has-acquired-youtube/" target=_blank>It's difficult to place a value on such deals&lt;/a> and many times you can only eyeball whether it was a good or bad deal a few years down the road.&amp;nbsp; I'm sure part of the incentive for Google was to lock out Yahoo! and other competitors from acquiring YouTube.&amp;nbsp; Imagine if Yahoo! acquired YouTube?&amp;nbsp; Google would always be second or worse in an ad space that has higher CPMs/CPCs than text AND seems to be the next big growth segment of online advertising.&amp;nbsp; &lt;br />&lt;br />If there could be such a controlled competitive field for Google, I'm sure they would have strongly considered to battle it out with YouTube and the rest of the field.&amp;nbsp; How long would it have taken for Google to catch up especially since they seem to be maturing and focusing their resources more strategically now?&lt;br />&lt;br />Anyway, &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/press/pressrel/google_youtube.html" target="_blank">here is the official press release&lt;/a>.&amp;nbsp; Dissenting &lt;a href="http://www.blogmaverick.com/2006/10/07/some-thoughts-on-youtube-and-google/" target="_blank">view from Mark Cuban&lt;/a>.&amp;nbsp; Posts &lt;a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/09/is-fox-a-factor-in-the-googleyoutube-deal/" target="_blank">from Michael Arrington, where he brings up some good points on Google's relationship with Fox&lt;/a>, and &lt;a href="http://www.paidcontent.org/goog-youtube-done-deal-165-billion-in-stock-2" target="_blank">PaidContent.org has more here&lt;/a>:&lt;br />&lt;br />&lt;span style="font-style: italic;">- Stock for stock transaction (for $1.65 billion)&lt;/span>&lt;span style="font-style: italic;">&lt;br />- YouTube will operate independently to &amp;ldquo;preserve its successful brand and passionate community&amp;rdquo;.&lt;/span>&lt;span style="font-style: italic;">&lt;br />- YouTube will continue to be based in San Bruno, CA, and all YouTube employees will remain with the company.&lt;br />- &lt;/span>&lt;span style="font-style: italic;">The number of Google shares to be issued in the transaction will be determined based on the 30-day average closing price two trading days prior to the completion of the acquisition.&lt;/span>&lt;/div>&lt;/div></description><link>http://bernardmoon.blogspot.com/2006/10/google-acquires-youtube.html</link><author>Bernard Moon</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5234812/posts/full/116009483503786531</guid><pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 00:30:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-10-06T13:51:26.010-07:00</atom:updated><title>WORSE HAIRCUT IN TEN YEARS

Quick post before I ta...</title><description>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">&lt;span style="font-weight:bold;">WORSE HAIRCUT IN TEN YEARS&lt;/span>&lt;br />&lt;br />Quick post before I take off for the airport. I went to this random hair salon in Palo Alto today. I asked for a trim and got a chop job.  Afterwards I looked like &lt;a href="http://www.threestooges.com/bios/bios.asp?intStoogeID=4" target=_blank>Shemp&lt;/a> from The Three Stooges. &lt;a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/2959/166/1600/photo_head_showard.jpg">&lt;img style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/2959/166/320/photo_head_showard.jpg" border="0" alt="" />&lt;/a> The worse part about it was that I had a meeting afterwards. So here I am looking like Shemp or a Chinese food delivery boy from the 70s facing these people that I don't know and probably thinking what I was thinking. Really sucked today.&lt;/div></description><link>http://bernardmoon.blogspot.com/2006/10/worse-haircut-in-ten-years-quick-post.html</link><author>Bernard Moon</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5234812/posts/full/116008306888297479</guid><pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 20:57:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-10-05T14:17:50.900-07:00</atom:updated><title>REVISITING ASIA... "ASIAN FAB 50"

A couple articl...</title><description>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">&lt;span style="font-weight:bold;">REVISITING ASIA... "ASIAN FAB 50"&lt;/span>&lt;br />&lt;br />A couple articles from Forbes that brings me back to my days in Asia. Definitely miss noodles houses, dim sum, and grouper in Hong Kong. Yes, grouper is the best fish to eat there.  Miss BBQ houses, stews, and other random stuff in Seoul.  Anyway, here are the articles:&lt;br />&lt;br />&lt;a href="http://www.forbes.com/lists/2006/37/biz_06fab50_Asias-Fab-50-Companies_land.html" target=_blank>"The Asian Fab 50"&lt;/a>&lt;br />&lt;br />&lt;a href="http://www.forbes.com/2006/09/28/richard-li-pccw-biz-cx_vk_0928li.html?partner=globalnews_newsletter" target=_blank>"Richard Li's Tangled Web"&lt;/a>&lt;/div></description><link>http://bernardmoon.blogspot.com/2006/10/revisiting-asia.html</link><author>Bernard Moon</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5234812/posts/full/115956016492757915</guid><pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 20:02:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-09-29T13:06:22.723-07:00</atom:updated><title>HILLARY CONDI HO DOWN!
Funny flash short on Hillar...</title><description>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">&lt;div style='font-weight:bold;'>HILLARY CONDI HO DOWN!&lt;/div>&lt;br />&lt;div>&lt;a href="http://i.euniverse.com/funpages/cms_content/13180/HillaryCondi_HoDown.swf" target="_blank">Funny flash short on Hillary and Condi fighting over&lt;/a> who is a better presidential candidate.&lt;/div>&lt;/div></description><link>http://bernardmoon.blogspot.com/2006/09/hillary-condi-ho-down-funny-flash.html</link><author>Bernard Moon</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5234812/posts/full/115955747001924824</guid><pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 19:17:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-09-29T12:19:29.633-07:00</atom:updated><title>CORPORATE BLOGGING  she see saw at DEMOfall.</title><description>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">&lt;div style='font-weight:bold;'>CORPORATE BLOGGING &amp; SOCIAL SOFTWARE SPACE HEATING UP... BUT CAN WEB 2.0 BE ADAPTED TO BUSINESSES?&lt;/div>&lt;br />&lt;div>It's been almost two years since I met &lt;a href="http://www.goingon.com/user/Tony%20Perkins" target="_blank">Tony&lt;/a> and he told me about his vision for &lt;a href="http://goingon.com" target="_blank">GoingOn&lt;/a>, and then he asked me to help build this company.&amp;nbsp; While I wasn't planning to do another startup for a few years, joining him was one of the best decisions I have made. It's been a fun ride so far and has been exciting to see the market develop and move faster than we ever foresaw.&lt;br />&lt;br />One healthy sign of an early market is the number of competitors leaping into your space.&amp;nbsp; It's been interesting to watch over the past several months some of competition that has been popping up:&lt;br />&lt;br />- &lt;a href="http://fiveacross.com" target="_blank">Five Across&lt;/a>, which use to be a private-label IM (instant message) client and had a blogging platform (Bubbler) targeting the SMB market, completely changed to become... a blogging and social networkng platform.&amp;nbsp; They position themselves as a &amp;quot;platform for social networking and communities.&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; It's interesting because over a year ago they approached us to partner with them.&amp;nbsp; I wonder where they got the idea for their revamped product and business model? Anyway, they recently signed a deal with the NHL, which was great for them and everyone in this space.&lt;br />&lt;br />- &lt;a href="http://pluck.com" target="_blank">Pluck&lt;/a>, which use to be a &lt;a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/30/the-state-of-online-feed-readers/" target="_blank">RSS feed reader company&lt;/a>, now primarily sells a blogging and social networking platform called &lt;a href="http://pluck.com/products/sitelife.html" target="_blank">SiteLife&lt;/a>.&amp;nbsp; They have taken a good approach in focusing on newspapers and media companies.&lt;br />&lt;br />- &lt;a href="http://crowdfactory.com/" target="_blank">Crowd Factory&lt;/a> is a recent entrant into our space.&amp;nbsp; One interesting note is that &lt;a href="http://www.goingon.com/permalink/post/3899" target="_blank">they promoted their product on our homepage/platform a month ago&lt;/a>.&amp;nbsp; I don't know why since we don't have that much traffic nor have we marketed our site enough to deserve such attention :)&lt;br />&lt;br />- &lt;a href="http://www.cerado.com" target="_blank">Cerado&lt;/a> is a CRM company who recently launched products (i.e. &amp;quot;Business Blogging&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Social Networking for Businesses&amp;quot;) in our space and like Crowd Factory &lt;a href="http://www.goingon.com/permalink/post/5835" target="_blank">promoted themselves on our platform&lt;/a> :)&lt;br />&lt;br />Then are there others such as &lt;a href="http://www.iupload.com/" target="_blank">iUpload&lt;/a> and &lt;a href="http://www.kinterainc.com/" target="_blank">Kintera&lt;/a>, and overlapping players such &lt;a href="http://kickapps.com/" target="_blank">KickApps&lt;/a> and &lt;a href="http://mybloglog.com" target="_blank">MyBlogLog&lt;/a> to name a few.&lt;br />&lt;br />Unlike many consumer &amp;quot;Web 2.0&amp;quot; plays, this competitive environment is not made up of one-feature companies that hope to generate enought traffic and get sold. All these players are selling something of value to companies and generating revenue, so it makes it a much more exciting market than something like the online calendar space.&lt;br />&lt;br />In recent news, ZDNet's Dion Hinchcliffe continues his &lt;a href="http://bernardmoon.blogspot.com/2006/08/enterprise-2.html" target="_blank">&amp;quot;Enterprise 2.0&amp;quot;&lt;/a> discussion with this post, &lt;a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/Hinchcliffe/?p=68" target="_blank">&amp;quot;Can Web 2.0 be adapted to the enterprise?&amp;quot;&lt;/a> Of course. And of course I'm using a broader definition of &amp;quot;enterprise&amp;quot; than Dion, but I believe any of the companies I listed above will say that the consumer &amp;quot;Web 2.0&amp;quot; movement will transform how companies operate, sell, market, and function behind their walls.&amp;nbsp; Omidyar Network's Christine Herron has some more information on this (&amp;quot;&lt;a href="http://www.christine.net/2006/09/consumer_techno.html" target="_blank">Web 2.0 Consumer Technology Hits the Enterprise&lt;/a>&amp;quot;) along with an overview of other applications and technologies reflective of this movement&amp;nbsp; she see saw at &lt;a href="http://demo.com" target="_blank">DEMOfall&lt;/a>.&lt;/div>&lt;/div></description><link>http://bernardmoon.blogspot.com/2006/09/corporate-blogging-she-see-saw-at.html</link><author>Bernard Moon</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5234812/posts/full/115951352813562629</guid><pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 07:05:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-09-29T00:06:43.296-07:00</atom:updated><title>"ONLY A MORON WOULD BUY YOUTUBE"... GOTTA LOVE CUB...</title><description>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">&lt;div style='font-weight:bold;'>"ONLY A MORON WOULD BUY YOUTUBE"... GOTTA LOVE CUBAN&lt;/div>&lt;br />&lt;div>You gotta love Mark Cuban. In &lt;a href="http://news.com.com/Mark+Cuban+Only+a+moron+would+buy+YouTube/2100-1026_3-6121034.html?tag=nefd.top" target="_blank">his latest public speech, he says only a moron would buy YouTube&lt;/a> due to the potential lawsuits from copyright violations.&amp;nbsp; Also the latest report from comScore Media Metrix doesn't help YouTube's valuation and potential sale:&lt;br />&lt;br />&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;">MySpace Leads in Number Of U.S. Video Streams Viewed Online, Capturing 20 Percent Market Share; Yahoo! Ranks #1 in Number of People Streaming&lt;/span>&lt;br />&lt;br />comScore Media Metrix, the leader in digital media measurement, today released an enhancement to its U.S. Video Metrix service, with the inclusion of Flash video content as part of the monthly rankings for streaming video sites.&lt;br />.....&lt;br />More than 106.5 million people, or about 3 out of every 5 U.S. Internet users, streamed or downloaded video during the month of July.&amp;nbsp; In total, nearly 7.2 billion videos were streamed or downloaded by U.S.&lt;br />.....&lt;br />Yahoo! Sites ranked as the top property by unique U.S. streamers with 37.9 million, followed very closely by MySpace, which attracted 37.4 million U.S. streamers.&amp;nbsp; Fast-rising YouTube ranked third with 30.5 million U.S. streamers, followed by the Time Warner Network (25.7 million U.S. streamers) and Microsoft Sites (16.2 U.S. million streamers).&amp;nbsp; &lt;span style="font-style: italic;">(&lt;/span>&lt;a href="http://www.comscore.com/press/release.asp?press=1015" target="_blank" style="font-style: italic;">full press release&lt;/a>&lt;span style="font-style: italic;">)&lt;/span>&lt;br />&lt;br />I wonder what Mark Cuban would &lt;a href="http://bernardmoon.blogspot.com/2006/09/facebook-worth-1-billion-few-days-ago.html" target="_blank">value Facebook at?&lt;/a>&lt;/div>&lt;/div></description><link>http://bernardmoon.blogspot.com/2006/09/only-moron-would-buy-youtube.html</link><author>Bernard Moon</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5234812/posts/full/115946713916484024</guid><pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 18:12:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-09-28T11:23:25.676-07:00</atom:updated><title>WE WEREN'T IN IRAQ WHEN THEY BOMBED THE WORLD TRAD...</title><description>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">&lt;div style='font-weight:bold;'>WE WEREN'T IN IRAQ WHEN THEY BOMBED THE WORLD TRADE CENTER OR 9/11&lt;/div>&lt;br />&lt;div>Admittedly, President Bush is not the most eloquent speaker, but he does get his point across in response to the liberals and liberal media blasting the airwaves with the recent report that supposedly concludes how the war in Iraq has fueled jihadism worldwide. &lt;a href="http://powerlineblog.com/archives/015391.php" target="_blank">Powerline has a video clip of Bush's response here&lt;/a> and more &lt;a href="http://powerlineblog.com/archives/015383.php" target="_blank">information here&lt;/a>.&lt;/div>&lt;/div></description><link>http://bernardmoon.blogspot.com/2006/09/we-werent-in-iraq-when-they-bombed.html</link><author>Bernard Moon</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5234812/posts/full/115946576597812322</guid><pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 17:47:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-09-28T10:49:26.013-07:00</atom:updated><title>FOXTROT'S VIEW OF WEB 2.0 AND USER-GENERATED CONTE...</title><description>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">&lt;span style="font-weight:bold;">FOXTROT'S VIEW OF WEB 2.0 AND USER-GENERATED CONTENT&lt;/span>&lt;br />&lt;br />Amusing cartoon strip:&lt;br />&lt;br />&lt;a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bernardmoon.blogspot.com/uploaded_images/web2foxtrot-745784.png">&lt;img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;" src="http://bernardmoon.blogspot.com/uploaded_images/web2foxtrot-734476.png" border="0" alt="" />&lt;/a>&lt;/div></description><link>http://bernardmoon.blogspot.com/2006/09/foxtrots-view-of-web-2.html</link><author>Bernard Moon</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5234812/posts/full/115931601519889552</guid><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 00:13:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-09-26T22:57:20.596-07:00</atom:updated><title>WALLOP LAUNCHED... YEAH, I'M GOOD
Here's a bit of ...</title><description>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">&lt;div style='font-weight:bold;'>WALLOP LAUNCHED... YEAH, I'M GOOD&lt;/div>&lt;br />&lt;div>Here's a bit of ego rubbing... rub, rub... rub, rub.&amp;nbsp; In my &lt;a href="http://www.alwayson-network.com/comments.php?id=8473_0_26_0_C" target="_blank">AlwaysOn column back in February 2005&lt;/a>, I expressed how I thought Wallop should have been publicly launched to compete with &lt;a href="http://myspace.com" target="_blank">MySpace&lt;/a> and &lt;a href="http://friendster.com" target="_blank">Friendster&lt;/a> during the initial rush in 2004.&amp;nbsp; I wish Microsoft would have taken my advice sooner since it's a little late in the game, but &lt;a href="http://wallop.com" target="_blank">Wallop&lt;/a> has finally launched as a separate entity with Karl Jacob at its helm.&amp;nbsp; He's a serial entrepreneur who has built successful companies, so it will be interesting to see how Wallop grows and develops in the consumer social software space.&lt;br />&lt;br />More from &lt;a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/25/microsoft-spinoff-wallop-launches/" target="_blank">TechCrunch here&lt;/a>, &lt;a href="http://mashable.com/2006/09/25/wallop-launches/" target=_blank>Mashable here&lt;/a>, and &lt;a href="http://news.com.com/Wallop+packs+a+social-networking+beta/2100-1032_3-6119538.html?tag=nefd.top" target="_blank">CNET here&lt;/a>.&lt;/div>&lt;/div></description><link>http://bernardmoon.blogspot.com/2006/09/wallop-launched.html</link><author>Bernard Moon</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5234812/posts/full/115922468759428632</guid><pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 22:25:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-09-26T16:43:47.146-07:00</atom:updated><title>ME? THE BACHELOR?

My wife found this amusing when...</title><description>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">&lt;span style="font-weight:bold;">ME? THE BACHELOR?&lt;/span>&lt;br />&lt;br />My wife found this amusing when I told her I got an invite through &lt;a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/bernardmoon" target=_blank>Linkedin&lt;/a> about being a possible &lt;a href="http://abc.go.com/primetime/bachelor/" target=_blank>Bachelor candidate&lt;/a>.&lt;br />&lt;br />&lt;span style="font-style:italic;">&lt;span style="font-weight:bold;">"Did they actually see you?!"&lt;/span>&lt;/span>&lt;br />&lt;br />She was referring to my extra 30 pounds of love I developed over the years and knew Linkedin, as a professional social networking site, didn't ask for pictures or marital status. She offered to write the ABC staffer that sent me the mass invite and explain how I was married and overweight and how I would hurt their ratings, but I declined.&lt;br />&lt;br />&lt;br />&lt;span style="font-style:italic;">Dear Bernard,&lt;br />&lt;br />ABC Television's hit reality television show, The Bachelor, is searching for its next star. After viewing your profile on LinkedIn, the casting producer has selected you as a potential candidate. &lt;br />&lt;br />ABC is using LinkedIn to find its next Bachelor because this time around, they're looking for an accomplished professional. LinkedIn is about your professional life instead of your personal life, so we don?t know if your marital or relationship status qualifies you for the show. However, your professional profile fits the bill.&lt;br /> &lt;br />If you think you'd make a great 'Bachelor,' please let me know by reply and I will contact you regarding next steps. LinkedIn respects your privacy and will not release your contact information, so you must reply to the email above for us to pass you along as a candidate...&lt;/span>&lt;/div></description><link>http://bernardmoon.blogspot.com/2006/09/me-bachelor-my-wife-found-this-amusing.html</link><author>Bernard Moon</author></item></channel></rss>